2005 Region III Championships 

April 9-10, 2005

Event Reports

 

Floor
Rome Milan

 

In general competitions on the floor Exercise were superior. Coaches and Athletes demonstrated an above average mastery of control and knowledge in the skills. This is obvious by the above average number of National qualifiers Region III produces each year. In order to maintain this advantage, all event officials have been asked to report areas of common mistakes to better assist the Region III Gymnastics coach in pursuing an understanding of these critical areas. Coaches may then target these areas which may need attention.

 

The Floor Exercise event was evaluated by: Rome Milan, Kevin Muenz and Kevin Bates. All certified through TGJA, NGJA and FIG standard testing.

 

In all Optional Levels the following tendencies were observed:

 

Routines once again have begun to take on the appearance of a standard identity where standard skills are selected to satisfy the rules. Almost compulsory in nature, the routines lacked little personal touch or Originality. In Levels 10 and 9 only three or four Originality Bonus tenths were awarded.

 

PRESS HANDSTANDS

Gymnasts demonstrated weakness in Handstand presses. Many gymnasts performed no hold, short holds or little control in the final handstand position. A large percentage of gymnasts needed to push off the floor or used a swing motion off the toes resulting in noncredit for the “B” value skill. Fewer but equally disappointing were the number of gymnasts who required bending of the arms to complete the press Handstand, which also resulted in noncredit of “B” value or deductions. Total mastery of the Press Handstand was so in frequent that in two instances Virtuosity was awarded to individuals who really were able to demonstrate the Press correctly and with full control.

 

113 deductions for partial or one second holds for 177 Static Strength elements performed in the Region III optional Floor Routines.

 

ARABIAN SKILLS

Gymnasts demonstrated improper technique in performing the Arabian front salto.

A disappointing number of gymnasts anticipated the twisting action prior to completion of the Round Off.  Many landing the Round Off in a 90 skew receiving a one tenth deduction and some Ύ or even 180 degree turned from proper direction prior to take off of salto for a deduction of two or three tenths. Other observances were the late twist resulting in the half twist not being complete prior to vertical as required by proper execution of the skill. Some Arabian Skills were performed with poor alignment from the rebound causing rotation to be skewed. In general the instances where the Arabian was performed after a back handspring these errors were not as noticed.

 

38 gymnasts received one tenth deduction for improper landing of Round off.(90 degrees)

15 Gymnasts received two or three tenths deduction.

There were 121 Arabian type Skills performed out of the 195 routines.

 

LANDINGS

Many gymnasts had landing errors. Where this may be normal what most seemed distressing was the lack of attention or even the impression that landing properly was not necessary in Arabian skills. Many gymnasts bounced out of the landing or stepped without the intention to land in a stable position.

 

Average .12 Landing errors on first pass

Average .078 Landing errors Last pass.

27 falls on mounts and dismounts.

 

Leap / Jump Requirement

Nakiyama type skills ( Jump Pike toe touch to Handstand and Prone) have become more common once again. When performing these skills, younger coaches should be more educated in the proper performance of this vintage skill. The gymnast should upon contact of hands on floor, lower with control to a straight-arm supported prone position. At this Regional Championships it was more commonly performed as a World Extreme Wrestling Federation Body Slam. Appropriate deductions were given.

PH Report
Mark Williams, Dean Matthews

 

Level 7 – Legwork- false scissors, scissors and legs cuts the cutting leg should be horizontal for no deduction, and this is where we had lots of deductions. Toe point in scissors and leg cuts is another place where all kids can do a better job. Most circles and loops were bent in the hips and had between .1 and .3 off. In flairs the legs should be straddled throughout the flair.

 

Level 8 – Have gymnasts do seven skills they can do well and get off. There is no repeating of skills so don’t do lots of extra circles. Top score was 8.45, top start score was 9.40.

 

Level 9 – Again there is no repetition of skills, Form on travels, skewed in travels, ½ spindle need to finish turn. Every gymnast had a deduction on scissors this is per FIG. On dismounts through handstand everyone had a deduction.

 

Level 10 – No repetition of skills, scissor same problem as with level 9, skewed on travels, we had three that did not have a deduction on travels. Strength on handstand dismounts.

 

I think there are to many gymnasts that are trying skills they can’t do, and we had lots of gymnasts that got no credit for skills because the skills were done so poorly .

 

 

Region III Championships Judges Report

Still Rings

Jim McKinney & Brian Cooper

 

Level 10: Good Routines overall.

Most deductions were taken for handstands using the straps, positions                      on strength parts, and bent arms on strength parts.

 

Level 9: Most often C part – back uprise straddle planche – usually with 0.2

                                              Deduction

                Swing handstand least often fulfilled structure group

                Several athletes received virtuosity in handstands, dislocates,or    

                 Inlocates.

                 Very few stuck dismounts.

 

Level 8: Important – NO REPETITION

 

Level 7: Most common deduction – bent arms during back uprise

                Tuck planche – some good routines had deductions for leaning on the

                                          Rings or straps.

                 Handstand – those who put feet on cables as directed tend  to score

Higher than ones who tried for bonus but can not do a handstand

                 90% of the athletes had a 1.0 deduction for a pike during the dismount

 

Level 6: Most athletes could do the back lever well.

                There were several who did the bonus handstand well.

                 Similar deductions to the level 7’s.

 

We have several outstanding coaches in RegionIII   !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Congratulations to the TGJA for a Great meet  !!

 

 

 

VAULT Report
Kevin Nee, Mark Townzen

 

General notes:  The height of the landing area for vaulting is 30 cm, 12 inches.  Other than landing deductions, most common deductions were post flight height and failure to extend prior to landing  salto vaults.  Only a couple of vaults took advantage of the .3 bonus.  More than once a good handspring would beat a bad tsuk.  Below is a recap to the most popular vaults and falls per level.

Level 7 – only 16 stick bonus vaults

Level 8 – falls (.5 deduction) 18, tsuk tuck 14, handspring 12, front salto tuck 8, tsuk pike 6, handspring full 5.

Level 9 – falls 9, tsuk tuck 24, tsuk pike 9, front salto tuck 7, tsuk lay 6.  one kas lay.

Level 10 – falls 15 (!), tsuk lay 21, front salto tuck 13, tsuk pike 6.  there were two yurchenko lay 2/1, and one roche.

 

 

 

 

 

Parallel Bars Report
J.T. Fletcher and James Sergeant

 

Level 7, 8, 9, & 10

 

Level 7 – The athletes at the Regional competition seemed to be better prepared than at the State meet (TX).

Seemed required areas were performed at required criteria; such as bails before the Moy, height of back uprise and higher swings forward and backwards.  This improvement led more bonus given for flawless skills and /or sequences.  Areas that still can be improved are holding the hold parts and finishing handstand positions.  Judges were surprised at the number of L’s and press handstands not held.

 

Level 8 – It is nice to see the numbers for this group have more than doubled from last year.  This is a fun group to judge and would be fun to coach.  Positive areas observed were some very well planned routines showing that the coaches know and understand the rules of Level 8.  Negative areas are skills being repeated and pirouettes that shouldn’t be in the routines until improved.

Also, once again, hold the hold parts.

 

Level 9 – It is very impressive to see the younger boys doing so many outstanding, upper level skills.  More specifically – giants, straight leg Moys, Stutzs, Diamidovs and awesome double backs.  Some of the higher scoring routines are because of extra element groups that wear met for bonus.  On the down side, seems there were several routines that had too many hold parts in addition to the hold parts not held.  An L is 2 seconds and anything less was deducted.

 

Level 10 – WOW!  It is obvious that the coaches are working their tales off!  The high skill level and the well-constructed routines were impressive and fun to judge.  Even the routines that were lacking in difficulty still managed to meet the special requirements and score well.  Make sure Stutzs are to or near a handstand if athlete needs the C value.  Scores could be higher if any and all straddle cut type of moves would get off the rails.  On the same note, hold the obvious skills such as L’s, V’s and presses; and be careful not the hold handstands before pirouettes and after Stutzs, for example, unless there are only three hold parts total.

 

If any of the coaches have specific questions they would like to ask, please email fletcher@bryanisd.org.

 

thanks

 

 

 

 

 

Horizontal Bar
Greg Kester, Chris Rippy

Level 7, 8, 9, & 10

High Bar at these levels, as a whole, noticeably improved from the beginning and middle of the season to the Region III Championships.  The most typical errors remained the same.  They were as follows:

 

Pirouette angle deductions                                         .1 - .3  per pirouette & .2 - .5 per routine

            In general, most routines would be better off if constructed around only 1 pirouette.

Bent knees during stemming action                          .1 - .4  combined for both sides of stemming action

Bent arms in Giant Swings                                     .05 - .1  especially when swinging after release move or

              missed skill

Bent knees in taps prior to release & dismount            .05 - .2  per instance (there were not many release moves in

              Level 9)

Angle deductions in endo, stalder, free hip skills            .1 - .2  per instance

            In general, most routines in Level 10 would be better off without the use of a free hip hand for

mount.

Landing deductions                                                     .1 to .5 resulting from small steps, multiple steps, hands &

                                                                                                knees landings, and complete falls

 

The 2 biggest areas of deductions, undoubtedly, arise from pirouette deductions and landing deductions.  Improving these 2 areas could up the score from .3 or .4 to up 1.0 difference in score.

 

GPA Bonus & Stick Bonus were harder to come by for Level 8 & 10 as compared to Level 7 & 9 levels, however, over all there has been much improvement in stick landings.

 

Level 10

Level 10 routines had a lot of endo skills, inside and outside, with or without 1/1 turns to mixed or eagle grip.  A lot of routines were missing a “C” value skill. The 2 element groups most missed were the el-grip/dorsal group, and the flight skill groups.

 

Level 9

The basic “stock” Level 9 routine was: Back Uprise – free hip – giant – giant – blind change – reverse grip giant – reverse grip giant – pirouette – giant – giant – double back  -- missing 1 “C” value skill & 1 special requirement, starting from a 8.1. (a few routines have cleverly removed the free hip.  They mount with something as simple as, stem in mix grip over the top – change one had to double under grip.  This has eliminated the free hip errors “risk).  When a C skill was present it was usually either an endo1/1 pirouette or a “C” or better valued dismount.  If extra element groups were present, they were typically for a flank vault (flight element) or Jam to El-grip – hop out (El-grip requirement).

 

Level 8

The level 8 routine was all about FORM.  Most gymnasts, in general, could have kept their routines a little simpler to gain higher scores.  There were a number of gymnasts who were missing parts, only performing 5 or 6 skills.  The typical Level 8 routine had between an 8.2 & 8.5 start score.

 

 

Level 7

The Level 7 routine was all about keeping tight form with the hollow body position in all swinging skills.  Most gymnasts were able to make it through the whole routine without major errors.  The most typical error was falling or strong breaking of form during the transition of ½ turn swing forward to the giant sequence at the end of the routine.  The areas where virtuosity was most likely to be given was for beautiful giant swings throughout the entire routine, a beautiful, early pirouette, a very tight, hollow swing ½ turn to nominal handstand, and a fly-a-way performed with tight, hollow body position with extreme amplitude.